## Interview with Frank Chester

The following is an interview with Frank Chester concerning the actual process of transformation that occurs from form to form. The interview was conducted by Seth Miller in 2001.  See a visual walk-through of how Frank discovered the chestahedron form here.

Seth: When did you begin to work with Platonic forms?

Frank: When I took Consciousness Studies, in the platonic forms section that Patricia Dickson taught. That was my first introduction to platonic forms. I had never seen them before.

How long ago was that?

One and a half years ago. [In 2000.]

And how is the form you work with related to platonic forms?

Well, there are five platonic forms and they have equal angles and equal surfaces. The thing about mine is that the surfaces are equal and in the platonic forms their surfaces are equal. The Saturn form is a semi-polyhedral form, in that all of the polygons aren’t the same. There are two different kinds of polygons: four equilateral triangles and three quadrilaterals, which makes seven.

The thing is that there hasn’t been a seven-sided polyhedron that has equal surfaces in any of the research. There is nothing in the books, in planar geometry, solid geometry, in the artistic or in the science literature. There has never been a seven-sided object with equal surfaces. And that is what is significant about this.

Is that what you set out to do?

No, no. After seeing the seals and capitals at the Goetheanum in 1997, I was inspired. I was told they were powerful forms; they were spiritual forms, which really interested me. But no matter where I looked in the books or in the Goetheanum, I never found any three-dimensional sculptures [of a seven-sided form]. They were always either one-dimensional or two-dimensional. I thought, “gee since I have this sculptural background I have to make one that is three-dimensional.” And I didn’t do it for two years. I wanted to do it but I didn’t have time. I was teaching college, I was busy, or whatever. When I took Consciousness Studies and the platonic forms were taught, I thought “this is my time to do this.” I started just before Christmas. I wanted to make a seven-sided object. Everything I did failed; I couldn’t do it. I did it with measurements. I tried to do it scientifically. I measured them. I took the seven-sided form in two dimensions and tried to put it in three dimensions and it didn’t work I tried to take seven sticks of the same length and put them in a piece of clay and measure them. It didn’t work. I tried to take seven balls and push them together with a piece of clay in the center, that didn’t work. A whole bunch of things that I tired–forget it, they didn’t work.

So then I decided to approach it artistically, which is the way I was trained. When I did I came up with a seven-sided form and I did about three or four of them and I finally refined it until it was quite nice. I showed that to Dennis Klocek and Patricia Dickson and they were really surprised at the shape. So Dennis said something to me that probably started the whole thing; he said to me, “Can you make that objective?” Then I said, ‘Well what do you mean objective?’ He answered, “That’s subjective”. And what that means is that it is artistic. But can I take it back into science. Can I take it from art to science? A month or so later I came up with the seven-sided form. It has seven sides, with forty-two triangles exactly the same size. Their surface areas are equal, and each one of those has six triangles which are exactly the same size, which together becomes a seven sided object. The only problem is that there are different shapes in there. So what I realized is that I needed to reduce the six to three. So I reduced the six triangles to three triangles, and I came up with four shapes that had three triangles, and three shapes that had four triangles. I thought “What is this all about?” So I decided to pour plaster into the form in equal amounts, then I took those forms out and glued them back together. And I came up with the Saturn form. I found that it had seven surfaces with equal area, and seven points, and it has seven edges. It was this beautiful semi-pyramid shape. It came out way beyond my expectations. The seven-sided form was absolutely beautiful. And neither Dennis nor I could find this shape anywhere in the literature. I went to Sacramento State and Davis and went through all the libraries and books for a couple days and found nothing like it. So then Dennis said that if it was possible to put it into a cube, then it is really significant. If you can relate it to the Platonic forms then it is really significant. So I put it into all the Platonic forms, and it fit. Not only did it go into the cube, but also it went into all five of the platonic forms–all the five Platonic forms has this form in it. That is significant. That’s what really got me into working more with this form, because there was so much coming from it.

Why do you continue to work with this form?

There is also a second part to this. After I discovered the form, I applied what Dennis Klocek had presented in his class on alchemy. I could have stopped with the seven-sided form and said, “this is beautiful and here it is,” but because of listening to his lecturing I know that alchemy works with inner work as well as with outer work. So I decided to take this alchemy and apply it to sculpture. So I took the process of alchemy and applied it to the form, and it just expanded the form into other beautiful forms that I am still working with today. To this very day I am still working with alchemy.

Are you aware of how your work with this form has affected your inner and outer life?

Yes. As far as the sculptural form itself I have developed the capacity to see forms without drawing them–nine sided forms, eleven sided forms, thirteen sided forms. I can see them develop in my mind–I can see them without having to actually make them, whereas before I struggled and struggled and struggled to get to that. Now I don’t even need to do that. I can see how these forms come, and I make them. So the process has been really shortened. Also because of seeing and working with the alchemical processes of earth to water and air to fire with my sculptures I also see these processes in my life. If I have a problem in my life, or a question in my life, or I don’t understand something in my life, I can take that ‘not understanding’ and put it through the same process I put sculptures through and I get really clear images of what to do and how to deal with situations. I can apply the alchemical processes that I learned through form to my inner work.

Wonderful!

Yeah, it is wonderful! I cannot believe how wonderful this is. You can actually take some material, learn the processes of material transformation and apply it to your inner work. I cannot believe how thankful I am for Dennis presenting alchemy in his class.

Were you aware of this affecting your inner work when you first began?

No, not at all. I had never heard of alchemy before.

Since you first began to work with these forms in the Consciousness Studies class a year and a half ago, how has its affect on your inner life changed since then?

Well, there are a couple of ways; I always “boo-hooed” the idea of destiny. I didn’t relate to it. But I also never could understand why I had certain skills, why I did certain things and why I moved into certain jobs. Why did I have these skills, why did I have these jobs, why did I have these experiences? And all of it now makes sense to me because of this process. I know now why I had these jobs, I know now why I had these skills. I needed them. This was my destiny to do this. And so that has just been a wonderful thing for me to realize. I mean my whole life is just glowing because of this process, and that destiny part is coming together. It’s allowed me to be more comfortable in my life. It also allows me to handle problems better in my life. Also I can lead a more spiritual life because of this, because I realize that these things are coming to me, and I’m at the point now where I’m absolutely dedicating my life to it. I don’t care what the income or the outcome or anything attached to it is. I’m doing it and I will continue to do it until it stops–and that I didn’t have before.

Do you find the forms that you work with in natural phenomenon?

The seven-sided form I haven’t found anywhere in nature except when a vortex forms in water. I noticed that the angles were very similar. When I put this form into the water process, from earth to water, I made the Saturn form out of wire and put into water and spun it with an electric drill, and there were unbelievable vortexes created by this form. I designed a propeller later, and the propeller outperforms any of the propellers I tested with those little model boats that go ninety miles an hour. I tested it at the same scale with these high-performance propellers and it outperforms them. But since I have moved on into the air process of reversal, and I haven’t gone back to the propeller idea since, but I plan to go back to it.

Do you find that these forms relate to social life?

Well this form is the most unbelievable Christian symbol I’ve ever seen. It has three crosses and four triangles. The four seasons, the four directions, the four elements, and the three crosses of the crucifixion. The crosses and the triangles are exactly the same square area. And right in the middle of the form is the Star of David. It has twelve edges, so there is the zodiac. It has seven points and seven surfaces. Even at one point there is the Christian shield that many people have in the past put the cross on the shield. I know there is also a second Star of David in here, that is larger, and I am very interested in seeing it’s proportion. The reason I haven’t done it yet is because I can’t go to fast with these things. There is a speed that I could go, but I have to constantly slow it down because it is so overwhelming. I don’t get any rest. If I have a question I go to sleep with it, I wake up, and within three hours I have answers. I can go to books and my dream tells me what page, and I go to that page and there’s the answer. So I have to be very careful, because it is just happening so fast. But this in a church would be just unbelievable. You could design buildings based on these proportions. There are at least nine golden proportions in this object, which is significant because the golden proportion is from the great geometrist in the sky–it is found throughout all of nature.

Have you seen any relation between these forms and the forms of world events?

I have put the seven-sided form into the sphere. Rudolf Steiner said in the third to the last lecture before he died that there was a semi-tetrahedron in the middle of the earth. And so I took this form, and I took exactly the points he indicated, and put the form into a scale model of the earth, and all the points hit exactly where he said they would hit, which was shocking. Now, he said that there was a pyramid like form in the middle of the earth, but at the time that he was saying this there wasn’t this seven sided form. It wasn’t here. But there was a tetrahedron, so he said it was a semi-tetrahedron. And the Saturn form is a semi-tetrahedron, except it has seven points. And one of the things that has always intrigued me was why did he go to the tetrahedron, which has four points, whereas all throughout his seals and his capitals he always dealt with seven. Why didn’t he deal with the seven in the middle of the earth, because all the seals and all the capitals are dealing with the evolution of the earth? The only thing I can think of is that there wasn’t a seven sided object then. But the seven sided object that came through this work fits where he says.

And then when I did an inversion of this form, which was the fire process in alchemy, I came up with the double-sided heart, the inverted heart, which I call Venus. This is exactly what his Venus seal is; two hearts inverted. So because of that process, whatever Steiner says I never hesitate to think that he may be right. But before I used to question everything he said. Oh my gosh now come on, what is this you know? But now my attitude is completely changed, because he saw the Saturn form turn into Venus without doing it. Somehow he didn’t do it–I had to do it, and it took me a year and a half to do it, and it came out exactly like he was saying, but he didn’t go through this process that I went through. If you look at Steiner’s seals the Saturn form evolves into the Venus form, which is two hearts. How did he know that if you invert the [seven-sided] Saturn form it turns into the Venus form, which is two hearts. Do you see two hearts in here?

No.

Neither did I. But I did the inversion process, the transformation, and that what came out. That beautiful heart shaped form came out–and it is all based on objectivity. There is no subjectivity in this. It’s all based on science. The curves are measured to be geometrically perfect, from the Saturn form being inverted. When you invert something you turn it inside out continuously. So you measure the movement and the movement is the dynamicness within a static form.

Why is this seven-sided form so meaningful to you?

First off, it has never been here before. That’s kind of cool. Then, when I put it into the alchemical process I discover so much about the form and about myself and about everything else. And I continue with the alchemical process. In other words I put it back into earth again, and then back into water. Then I’ll reverse it, and so forth, all the way around. And I will continue to do this–like Dennis says, you can continue to do this. You can have a new earth after taking it through the whole process. I am finding out directly that that is true, so I don’t know where I am going to stop. I study the data, then I see what is changing, then I see what is reversing, and then I see what is transforming. And what has transformed I put back into earth again, which is data, the facts. And I’ll study the measurements and so forth, and I’ll see what is changing and then I’ll reverse that. Also because this form is new, everything that comes from it is new. All of my forms are new. Not because of me, but because of the original form.